InData Labs
Cyprus-headquartered data science and AI consultancy
Founded 2014 | Limassol, Cyprus | 51-200 employees
Data EngineeringMachine LearningNLPComputer Vision
What is InData Labs?
InData Labs was founded in 2014 by gaming-industry veteran Marat Karpeko and is headquartered in Cyprus, with additional offices reported in Lithuania and the US. Employee figures vary from roughly 65 to 200 across different trackers, which is common for firms that mix core staff with project-based contractors. The company's practice centers on data science consulting: predictive analytics, natural language processing, computer vision, and big data analytics, positioned as a data-first alternative to firms that lead with generative AI branding.
InData Labs works primarily with clients in Retail & e-commerce, Gaming, Fintech, Healthcare sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Data-science-first practice rather than a generative-AI-branded service line.
InData Labs tech stack and services
Pythonscikit-learnTensorFlowApache SparkAWS
| Service area |
|---|
| Data Engineering |
| Machine Learning |
| NLP |
| Computer Vision |
InData Labs pricing
Short answer: InData Labs uses a fixed project or dedicated team pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed project | From not disclosed | Well-defined scope |
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
InData Labs does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
InData Labs pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Founder's gaming-industry background brings real-time data experience to computer vision work. | -Reported team size varies close to 3x across public sources |
| +EU-based headquarters (Cyprus) can simplify GDPR-aligned data handling for European clients. | -Less public-facing generative AI and LLM case work than firms built around that specifically |
| +Predictive analytics and NLP depth predate the generative AI hype cycle. | |
| +Decade-plus track record in a narrower, more defensible specialty than broad AI consulting. |
InData Labs vs alternatives
How InData Labs compares to the other top AI Development companies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensorway | Regulated-industry teams needing compliant, production AI. | Full IP transfer plus GDPR/HIPAA/ISO-certified delivery on every engagement | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| BlueLabel | Product teams wanting AI features tied to real... | Decade of product-design discipline applied to LLM and agent engineering | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Markovate | Startups needing a dedicated AI product partner, not... | Ten years of AI-only positioning predating the current generative AI wave | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| DataRoot Labs | Data-heavy startups needing applied ML research capacity. | R&D-style engagement model built for startups, not enterprise procurement | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| ITRex Group | Enterprises needing AI tied to existing data infrastructure. | Fifteen years pairing AI delivery with the underlying data engineering it depends on | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Valiance Solutions | Government and public-sector bodies needing decision-support AI. | Built specifically around public-sector and government AI procurement, not consumer AI | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| BotsCrew | SMBs wanting a dedicated conversational AI specialist. | Chatbot and agent development as the sole focus since founding, not an added service line | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| EPAM Systems | Fortune 500 buyers needing AI at global engineering... | Public company scale (NYSE: EPAM) with AI folded into a much larger engineering practice | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Grid Dynamics | Enterprises wanting a public, auditable AI engineering partner. | Nasdaq-listed (GDYN) with quarterly financial disclosure most competitors don't provide | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| LeewayHertz | Buyers wanting broad AI service coverage under one... | Backed by The Hackett Group's consulting and benchmarking network post-acquisition | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Master of Code Global | Enterprises standardizing conversational AI across channels. | Two decades focused specifically on enterprise conversational AI, longer than most on this list | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Softermii | Teams needing AI features built into a broader... | Full-stack product development capability alongside newer AI service lines | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| SoftKraft | Startups on a budget needing data-driven MVP work. | Small dedicated team pricing squarely at startup and SME budgets, not enterprise rates | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | Enterprises wanting AI paired with cloud and embedded... | 50-plus delivered AI projects backed by named enterprise clients like Bosch and Siemens | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Innowise Group | Buyers wanting one vendor to cover every AI... | Full-cycle coverage of nearly every AI service category under a single 2,000-plus person firm | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| 10Clouds | Product teams wanting AI folded into UX and... | AI treated as one integrated capability inside full product design and development | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Cleveroad | Startups needing AI features inside a mobile or... | Production-deployment discipline carried over from a decade of mobile and web delivery | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Accenture | Global enterprises running AI transformation across many business... | 60,000-plus trained generative AI practitioners inside a global consulting organization | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| AtliQ Technologies | Budget-conscious teams wanting AI added to a product... | US and India presence at startup-friendly pricing for a firm founded in 2017 | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Simform | Enterprises pairing AI with a larger cloud engineering... | 1,400-plus engineers spanning six continents inside one accountable vendor | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| 10Pearls | Enterprises wanting AI bundled with digital transformation work. | Two decades of digital transformation delivery with AI as an established add-on practice | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| DataArt | Enterprises in finance or healthcare needing AI at... | Nearly 30 years of engineering history across 30-plus global delivery locations | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Intellectsoft | Enterprises wanting AI alongside blockchain or IoT work. | Combines AI with blockchain and IoT engineering under one roof | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Debut Infotech | Mobile-first products needing AI features added on. | Mobile and digital product development background with AI layered on top | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| eSparkBiz | Cost-sensitive teams needing certified AI-adjacent delivery. | CMMI Level 3 and ISO 9001 certification uncommon among firms this size | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Growexx | Startups wanting fast-growing engineering capacity with AI. | Younger, fast-scaling team actively expanding a dedicated AI division | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| TechAhead | Mobile app teams wanting AI added without switching... | US and India dual headquarters with 22% year-over-year headcount growth reported | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Intuz | IoT-heavy products needing AI layered on top of... | AI paired specifically with IoT delivery experience, not offered separately | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| HYS Enterprise | EU clients wanting Netherlands-based contracting with Poland delivery. | Amsterdam legal entity with an Eastern European delivery hub for EU-based contracting | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Iflexion | Enterprises wanting AI from a long-established custom software... | Over 25 years of custom software delivery history predating most AI-focused competitors | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Infosys | Global enterprises needing AI inside a full IT... | One of the world's largest IT services firms with a dedicated London-based consulting arm | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Coherent Solutions | Enterprises wanting broad global delivery footprint flexibility. | Nine-country offshore delivery network built over three decades | 3.9 | Full comparison |
InData Labs FAQ
What is InData Labs?
Cyprus-headquartered data science and AI consultancy
How much does InData Labs charge?
InData Labs uses fixed project or dedicated team pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does InData Labs use?
InData Labs works with Python, scikit-learn, TensorFlow, Apache Spark, AWS. Primary industries served include Retail & e-commerce, Gaming, Fintech, Healthcare.
Is InData Labs right for enterprise?
Teams needing data science depth before an AI product build. 51-200 team size. Key consideration: Reported team size varies close to 3x across public sources.
What are the best InData Labs alternatives?
The best alternatives to InData Labs depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Tensorway: full ip transfer plus gdpr/hipaa/iso-certified delivery on every engagement
- BlueLabel: decade of product-design discipline applied to llm and agent engineering
- Markovate: ten years of ai-only positioning predating the current generative ai wave
Compare InData Labs with other AI Development companies
InData Labs vs Tensorway InData Labs vs BlueLabel InData Labs vs Markovate InData Labs vs DataRoot Labs InData Labs vs ITRex Group InData Labs vs Valiance Solutions InData Labs vs BotsCrew InData Labs vs EPAM Systems InData Labs vs Grid Dynamics InData Labs vs LeewayHertz InData Labs vs Master of Code Global InData Labs vs Softermii InData Labs vs SoftKraft InData Labs vs N-iX InData Labs vs Innowise Group InData Labs vs 10Clouds InData Labs vs Cleveroad InData Labs vs Accenture InData Labs vs AtliQ Technologies InData Labs vs Simform InData Labs vs 10Pearls InData Labs vs DataArt InData Labs vs Intellectsoft InData Labs vs Debut Infotech InData Labs vs eSparkBiz InData Labs vs Growexx InData Labs vs TechAhead InData Labs vs Intuz InData Labs vs HYS Enterprise InData Labs vs Iflexion InData Labs vs Infosys InData Labs vs Coherent Solutions
Verify all details directly with InData Labs before making a decision.