EPAM Systems
NYSE-listed engineering firm with company-wide AI transformation practice
Founded 1993 | Newtown, United States | 62,000+ employees
Enterprise AIGenerative AIMachine LearningMLOpsAI Consulting
What is EPAM Systems?
EPAM Systems was founded in 1993 in New Jersey and Minsk by Arkadiy Dobkin and Leo Lozner, and has traded on the New York Stock Exchange since 2012 as a member of the S&P 500. The company employed roughly 62,850 people across more than 55 countries at the end of 2025, which puts it in a different capacity class from every other firm on this list. EPAM markets itself as a leader in AI transformation engineering, and its scale means AI work is one part of a much larger digital engineering and cloud transformation business rather than the whole of it.
EPAM Systems works primarily with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Media & entertainment sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Public company scale (NYSE: EPAM) with AI folded into a much larger engineering practice.
EPAM Systems tech stack and services
PythonAWSAzureGoogle CloudKubernetesDatabricks
| Service area |
|---|
| Enterprise AI |
| Generative AI |
| Machine Learning |
| MLOps |
| AI Consulting |
EPAM Systems pricing
Short answer: EPAM Systems uses a retainer or dedicated team, enterprise contracting pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Retainer | Monthly rate; not public | Ongoing AI engineering |
EPAM Systems does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
EPAM Systems pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Public-company financial transparency and stability that private firms on this list can't match. | -AI is one line of business inside a much larger engineering firm, not a dedicated specialty |
| +Scale to staff multiple large AI programs across regions simultaneously. | -Enterprise scale typically means longer sales cycles and higher minimum engagement sizes than boutiques |
| +S&P 500 membership signals enterprise procurement teams can vet it through standard due diligence. | |
| +Cloud partnerships span all three major hyperscalers. |
EPAM Systems vs alternatives
How EPAM Systems compares to the other top AI Development companies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensorway | Regulated-industry teams needing compliant, production AI. | Full IP transfer plus GDPR/HIPAA/ISO-certified delivery on every engagement | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| BlueLabel | Product teams wanting AI features tied to real... | Decade of product-design discipline applied to LLM and agent engineering | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Markovate | Startups needing a dedicated AI product partner, not... | Ten years of AI-only positioning predating the current generative AI wave | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| DataRoot Labs | Data-heavy startups needing applied ML research capacity. | R&D-style engagement model built for startups, not enterprise procurement | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| ITRex Group | Enterprises needing AI tied to existing data infrastructure. | Fifteen years pairing AI delivery with the underlying data engineering it depends on | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Valiance Solutions | Government and public-sector bodies needing decision-support AI. | Built specifically around public-sector and government AI procurement, not consumer AI | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| BotsCrew | SMBs wanting a dedicated conversational AI specialist. | Chatbot and agent development as the sole focus since founding, not an added service line | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Grid Dynamics | Enterprises wanting a public, auditable AI engineering partner. | Nasdaq-listed (GDYN) with quarterly financial disclosure most competitors don't provide | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| LeewayHertz | Buyers wanting broad AI service coverage under one... | Backed by The Hackett Group's consulting and benchmarking network post-acquisition | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| InData Labs | Teams needing data science depth before an AI... | Data-science-first practice rather than a generative-AI-branded service line | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Master of Code Global | Enterprises standardizing conversational AI across channels. | Two decades focused specifically on enterprise conversational AI, longer than most on this list | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Softermii | Teams needing AI features built into a broader... | Full-stack product development capability alongside newer AI service lines | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| SoftKraft | Startups on a budget needing data-driven MVP work. | Small dedicated team pricing squarely at startup and SME budgets, not enterprise rates | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | Enterprises wanting AI paired with cloud and embedded... | 50-plus delivered AI projects backed by named enterprise clients like Bosch and Siemens | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Innowise Group | Buyers wanting one vendor to cover every AI... | Full-cycle coverage of nearly every AI service category under a single 2,000-plus person firm | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| 10Clouds | Product teams wanting AI folded into UX and... | AI treated as one integrated capability inside full product design and development | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Cleveroad | Startups needing AI features inside a mobile or... | Production-deployment discipline carried over from a decade of mobile and web delivery | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Accenture | Global enterprises running AI transformation across many business... | 60,000-plus trained generative AI practitioners inside a global consulting organization | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| AtliQ Technologies | Budget-conscious teams wanting AI added to a product... | US and India presence at startup-friendly pricing for a firm founded in 2017 | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Simform | Enterprises pairing AI with a larger cloud engineering... | 1,400-plus engineers spanning six continents inside one accountable vendor | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| 10Pearls | Enterprises wanting AI bundled with digital transformation work. | Two decades of digital transformation delivery with AI as an established add-on practice | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| DataArt | Enterprises in finance or healthcare needing AI at... | Nearly 30 years of engineering history across 30-plus global delivery locations | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Intellectsoft | Enterprises wanting AI alongside blockchain or IoT work. | Combines AI with blockchain and IoT engineering under one roof | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Debut Infotech | Mobile-first products needing AI features added on. | Mobile and digital product development background with AI layered on top | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| eSparkBiz | Cost-sensitive teams needing certified AI-adjacent delivery. | CMMI Level 3 and ISO 9001 certification uncommon among firms this size | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Growexx | Startups wanting fast-growing engineering capacity with AI. | Younger, fast-scaling team actively expanding a dedicated AI division | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| TechAhead | Mobile app teams wanting AI added without switching... | US and India dual headquarters with 22% year-over-year headcount growth reported | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Intuz | IoT-heavy products needing AI layered on top of... | AI paired specifically with IoT delivery experience, not offered separately | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| HYS Enterprise | EU clients wanting Netherlands-based contracting with Poland delivery. | Amsterdam legal entity with an Eastern European delivery hub for EU-based contracting | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Iflexion | Enterprises wanting AI from a long-established custom software... | Over 25 years of custom software delivery history predating most AI-focused competitors | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Infosys | Global enterprises needing AI inside a full IT... | One of the world's largest IT services firms with a dedicated London-based consulting arm | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Coherent Solutions | Enterprises wanting broad global delivery footprint flexibility. | Nine-country offshore delivery network built over three decades | 3.9 | Full comparison |
EPAM Systems FAQ
What is EPAM Systems?
NYSE-listed engineering firm with company-wide AI transformation practice
How much does EPAM Systems charge?
EPAM Systems uses retainer or dedicated team, enterprise contracting pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does EPAM Systems use?
EPAM Systems works with Python, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Kubernetes, Databricks. Primary industries served include Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Media & entertainment.
Is EPAM Systems right for enterprise?
Fortune 500 buyers needing AI at global engineering scale. 62,000+ team size. Key consideration: AI is one line of business inside a much larger engineering firm, not a dedicated specialty.
What are the best EPAM Systems alternatives?
The best alternatives to EPAM Systems depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Tensorway: full ip transfer plus gdpr/hipaa/iso-certified delivery on every engagement
- BlueLabel: decade of product-design discipline applied to llm and agent engineering
- Markovate: ten years of ai-only positioning predating the current generative ai wave
Compare EPAM Systems with other AI Development companies
EPAM Systems vs Tensorway EPAM Systems vs BlueLabel EPAM Systems vs Markovate EPAM Systems vs DataRoot Labs EPAM Systems vs ITRex Group EPAM Systems vs Valiance Solutions EPAM Systems vs BotsCrew EPAM Systems vs Grid Dynamics EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz EPAM Systems vs InData Labs EPAM Systems vs Master of Code Global EPAM Systems vs Softermii EPAM Systems vs SoftKraft EPAM Systems vs N-iX EPAM Systems vs Innowise Group EPAM Systems vs 10Clouds EPAM Systems vs Cleveroad EPAM Systems vs Accenture EPAM Systems vs AtliQ Technologies EPAM Systems vs Simform EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls EPAM Systems vs DataArt EPAM Systems vs Intellectsoft EPAM Systems vs Debut Infotech EPAM Systems vs eSparkBiz EPAM Systems vs Growexx EPAM Systems vs TechAhead EPAM Systems vs Intuz EPAM Systems vs HYS Enterprise EPAM Systems vs Iflexion EPAM Systems vs Infosys EPAM Systems vs Coherent Solutions
Verify all details directly with EPAM Systems before making a decision.